[USML Announce] USML Rules Voting
Richard E. Robbins
RERobbins at iTinker.net
Sun Feb 8 13:30:23 EST 2004
Mr. Winick, I believe you have the microphone. . .
P.S.
Before we go nuts trying to fix the floor if alternative C is adopted, I'd
ask people to reconsider alternative A for the reasons I mentioned in recent
days and also for the reasons Jeff W. mentioned. Trying to patch the floor
in the wake of alternative C may be truly messy.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: announce-bounces at usml.net
> [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of john.fruit at usbank.com
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 12:15 PM
> To: USML Announcements
> Cc: 'USML Announcements'; announce-bounces at usml.net
> Subject: RE: [USML Announce] USML Rules Voting
>
>
> [snip
>
> Is there a roster integrity issue beyond just unloading
> high-priced players to contenders? It seems like the salary
> cap already guards against over-aggressive dumping.
>
More information about the Announce
mailing list