[USML Announce] Draft Eligibility - PLEASE VOTE
john.fruit at usbank.com
john.fruit at usbank.com
Mon Mar 8 15:41:35 EST 2004
My preference is to use the 40 man rosters plus Mauer plus specifically
identified major league players who appear on the NRI lists and who have
lost major league rookie status. Any league owner can identify a player
meeting the criteria for being added to the list. I will undertake to
maintain the list of players suggested by league owners and circulate it on
a daily basis. Believe it or not, this is what I think Kerber suggested
day one on this topic.
I will vote for Rich's aformentioned proposal.
"Richard E.
Robbins" To: announce at usml.net
<RERobbins at itinke cc:
r.net> Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Draft Eligibility - PLEASE VOTE
Sent by:
announce-bounces@
usml.net
03/08/2004 02:18
PM
Please respond to
"USML
Announcements"
This is tough.
In a perfect world, I'd prefer to identify major league vets from the NRI
lists and add them to those on the 40 man rosters. This would result in a
situation in which the only prospects subject to the auction draft are
those on the 40 man lists -- which I believe to be an unavoidable result.
This is what I believe Mark Kerber suggested at the outset.
Is it better to have a draft in which Surhoff, McLemore, Bernard etc. are
not eligible or one in which Reed, Blanton, Craine etc. are eligible?
Limiting matters to the 40 man roster eliminates major league vets who I
believe should be in the draft.
Expanding to full NRIs adds in a number of prospects that should probably
not be there. One can argue that having introduced prospects by going to
40 man rosters we should also add NRI prospects since it's hard to tell why
a major league club puts a player on the 40 man as opposed to making the
player an NRI (consider Joe Mauer for example). On the other hand, if
introducing prospects is not a good thing, then limiting things even if the
rule turns out to be arbitrary is not necessarily a bad thing.
My preference is to use the 40 man rosters plus Mauer plus specifically
identified major league players who appear on the NRI lists and who have
lost major league rookie status. Any league owner can identify a player
meeting the criteria for being added to the list. I will undertake to
maintain the list of players suggested by league owners and circulate it on
a daily basis. Believe it or not, this is what I think Kerber suggested
day one on this topic.
If my suggestion is not acceptable to a majority then I'll support Jeff's
second alternative.
-- Rich
On March 8, 2004, JHWinick at aol.com wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> After a long discussion with Rich Robbins, it seems that there is a need
to
> lock this issue down. Therefore, I put the following issue to the league
> for a vote. There are three options:
>
> 1. Only players on 40 man rosters (plus Joe Mauer) are eligible to be
> drafted.
> 2. Only players on 40 man rosters or on the Non Roster Invitee List
are
> eligible to be drafted.
> 3. Only players on the 40 man rosters plus those players identified
and
> agreed upon by the league membership will be eligible to the drafted.
>
> As you may have seen with my prior email, there are a number of major
league
> veterans that are on the NRI list (Helling, McLemore) as well as a few
> prospects that may break camp with the team (Blanton, Crain, Reed, etc.).
> It is worth noting that there are also quite a few pure prospects on the
> 40 man rotations (Delmon Young, Bobby Jenks, etc.).
> I think this is an imperfect situation
> where we ought to let the market work - i.e. let everyone have an
> equal crack at all of these players knowing full well that they may be
> worthless this year and will have contracts already starting to run.
>
> Lets see if we can get this resolved today.
>
> Jeff Winick
More information about the Announce
mailing list