[USML Announce] Baseball Draft
Richard E. Robbins
RERobbins at iTinker.net
Wed Jun 8 11:45:20 EDT 2005
That's why you need to plant a large garden. Hey, don't I have the guy that used to be BJ Upton. (E - Red-Hots)
-----Original Message-----
From: JHWinick at aol.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:42:11
To:announce at usml.net
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Baseball Draft
In a message dated 6/8/2005 10:17:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time, springkerb at aol.com writes:
$10 rookies? Not super-common, but not particularly rare, either. Baldelli and Crawford come to mind without thinking about it very hard or going back more than a couple of years. Advanced college hitters like Gordon and Clement are particularly good candidates to succeed quickly--think about John Olerud, Dave Winfield and Barry Bonds, or more recently Mark Teixiera. And my guys all have $2 salaries, so it's not like there's any downside risk.
I agree with the comment on rookie pitchers, though. They are nothing but rolls of the dice.
Mark
Not super rare? I beg to differ. Olerud, Winfield and Bonds are all old enough that they pre-date most of our rotisserie involvement and, as you'll see below, their rookie campaigns were hardly stellar. Baldelli wasn't particularly highly touted, so I don't think he fairly qualifies. And he sure did fade after a hot start. Crawford put up 2 HR, 30 RBI and 9 SB's his rookie year. Not a very valuable effort. Olerud - 14-48-0 .265. $10? I don't think so. Bonds - 16-28-36 .223. The 36 stolen bases probably get him to double digits in value, but the .223 average means he wasn't worth too much more. And Bonds is a hall of famer. You really think the likes of Alex Gordon and Jeff Clement are going to do better?
I appreciate the puffery. I'm taking notes for future pitches to Blocker and Robbins. But I think the proof is in the pudding and most of these magic beans never sprout.
Jeff
More information about the Announce
mailing list