[USML Announce] Baseball Draft

Richard E. Robbins RERobbins at iTinker.net
Wed Jun 8 11:45:20 EDT 2005


That's why you need to plant a large garden.  Hey, don't I have the guy that used to be BJ Upton. (E - Red-Hots)
-----Original Message-----
From: JHWinick at aol.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:42:11 
To:announce at usml.net
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Baseball Draft

In a message dated 6/8/2005 10:17:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time, springkerb at aol.com writes:   
$10 rookies?  Not super-common, but not particularly rare,   either.  Baldelli and Crawford come to mind without thinking about it   very hard or going back more than a couple of years.  Advanced college   hitters like Gordon and Clement are particularly good candidates to succeed   quickly--think about John Olerud, Dave Winfield and Barry Bonds, or more   recently Mark Teixiera.  And my guys all have $2 salaries, so   it's not like there's any downside risk.   
   
I agree with the comment on rookie pitchers, though.  They are   nothing but rolls of the dice.   
   
Mark 
 
Not super rare? I beg to differ.  Olerud, Winfield and Bonds are all old enough that they pre-date most of our rotisserie involvement and, as you'll see below, their rookie campaigns were hardly stellar.  Baldelli wasn't particularly highly touted, so I don't think he fairly qualifies.  And he sure did fade after a hot start.  Crawford put up 2 HR, 30 RBI and 9 SB's his rookie year.  Not a very valuable effort.  Olerud - 14-48-0 .265.  $10? I don't think so.  Bonds - 16-28-36 .223.  The 36 stolen bases probably get him to double digits in value, but the .223 average means he wasn't worth too much more.  And Bonds is a hall of famer.  You really think the likes of Alex Gordon and Jeff Clement are going to do better? 
 
I appreciate the puffery.  I'm taking notes for future pitches to Blocker and Robbins.  But I think the proof is in the pudding and most of these magic beans never sprout. 
 
Jeff



More information about the Announce mailing list