[USML Announce] Tyner

[Richard E. Robbins]

Agreed.  Mr. Blocker -- are we missing something that troubles you about
this?

- -Rich

 

-----Original Message-----
From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf
Of jhwinick at aol.com
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 10:04 AM
To: USML Announcements
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Tyner

I concur, but leave open the possibility that Mark B believes there are
other factors that complicate the decision. 

Jeff
Sent from my BlackBerry? wireless handheld  

-----Original Message-----
From: "Richard E. Robbins" <RERobbins at iTinker.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:57:44
To:"'USML Announcements'" <announce at usml.net>
Subject: RE: [USML Announce] Tyner

On these facts, I think Tyner belongs to Kerber. 
? 
-- Rich
 
 
----------------
 From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf Of SpringKerb at aol.com
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 9:27 AM
To: announce at usml.net
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Tyner

 
 
I put in a contingent bid for him--contingent on having FAAB remaining after
processing of my non-contingent bid on Matt Garza.? The Garza bid was not
successful, and no one else bid on Tyner, so I should have gotten Tyner for
$5.? Mark B had not processed the Tyner bid because he thought I did not
have FAAB remaining; however, I did since the Garza bid was unsuccessful.?
(No one else bid on Tyner the next week either, so I would/could have
purchased him again then, except that my question had not been answered that
week.)? The question has now been pending for two weeks. 
? 
Mark_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce