[USML Announce] Serious Rule Change Proposal
Brad Jansen
bljansen at gmail.com
Wed Mar 28 10:15:34 EDT 2007
I vote no.
Respectfully,
BLJ
On 3/28/07, Andrew R. Klein <anrklein at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> League-
>
> Here is a serious rules proposal. My usual caveat applies -- I have
> been part of the league for 18 years and hope that we're still playing
> 18 years from now. The proposal is not end-of-the-world stuff; it just
> reflects some issues that have impacted my enjoyment of the game.
> Here's the proposal:
>
> Article XII
>
> 13. No player may be traded until his USML contract is running. This
> rule shall not apply to players retained by team owners before April 1,
> 2007.
>
>
> My reasons for making the proposal follow.
>
> 1. As you know, I do not share the enthusiasm that many league members
> have for prospecting. I'm fine with prospects supplementing a league
> based on major league players. But in recent years I feel as if our
> league has worked the other way around. My proposal would allow
> prospecting in the rotation draft to continue unabated. An owner could
> watch prospects develop and then retain them (or trade them) after a
> call-up. But the proposal would eliminate the movement of top-flight
> major leaguers for players who are years away from contributing to our
> actual standings. To me, this would be a good thing. No longer would
> the biggest leg-up on competitiveness be the ability to engage in dump
> deals for minor league prospects.
>
> 2. Our current rules encourage people to dump very early if they want
> to position themselves to win a future title. I know that a number of
> league members dislike this aspect of the league and would rather have
> rules that encourage teams to play for a while before looking to next
> season. The proposal would make early dumping harder to accomplish and
> a riskier proposition.
>
> 3. The proposal contains a grandfathering clause so teams that have
> gathered prospects under our current rules (like the Riptorns) are not
> disadvantaged. Administering this would be easy. We could simply list
> the names of the 30 or so exempted players on usml.net and cross them
> off as they become active or are waived.
>
> That is all for now. I ask our esteemed commissioners to tally votes.
>
> -Andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20070328/686b3e52/attachment.htm
More information about the Announce
mailing list