[USML Announce] USML Trivia - Part II

[Andrew R. Klein]

Same here.  BTW, there was one year where the Rips beat me by the 
equivalent of 1 or 2 hits, which kept him ahead in BA.  I'll have to 
look back for the year.

-Andy

Blocker, Mark B. wrote:
>
> Jeff:
>
>   I have not been responding, but I am definitely enjoying these.  
> Keep 'em coming.
>
>   -- Mark B.
>
>
>
>
> Mark B. Blocker
> Sidley Austin LLP
> One South Dearborn Street
> Chicago, IL 60603
> Tel: (312) 853-6097
> Fax: (312) 853-7036
> E-mail: Mblocker at sidley.com
> Assistant: Sylvia Tillig (312) 853-7699
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: announce-bounces at usml.net <announce-bounces at usml.net>
> To: announce at usml.net <announce at usml.net>
> Sent: Mon Oct 08 00:12:35 2007
> Subject: [USML Announce] USML Trivia - Part II
>
> Given the unbelievable reception to the first round of USML trivia, I 
> really felt like round II was command performance.  So here goes:
>
> 1.     Total Points
>
>
>
> Total Points
>
> 1989        72.0                Block?s Bombers (11)
> 1990        55.0                Berliners (10)
> 1991        67.5                Klein Nine (10)
> 1992        74.0                Berliners (10)(92.5%)
> 1993        74.0                Block?s Bombers (10)(92.5%)
> 1994        62.0                Klein Nine (10)
> 1995        61.5                Red Hots (10)
> 1996        71.5                Berliners (10)
> 1997        77.5                Riptorns (11)
> 1998        84.0                Riptorns (11)(95.4%)
> 1999        76.0                Riptorns (11)
> 2000        62.0                Riptorns (9)
> 2001        67.0                Nukes (9)(93.0%)
> 2002        90.5                Riptorns (10)(5x5)(90.5%)
> 2003        89.0                Berliners (10)(5x5)
> 2004        101.0              Nukes (11)(5x5)(91.8%)
> 2005        93.5                Hoosier (11)(5x5)
> 2006        102.0              Nukes (11)(5x5)(92.7%)
> 2007        93.5                Berliners (11)(5x5)
>
>
> The Nukes campaigns of 2004 of 2006 were pretty damned impressive and 
> unmatched in USML history for total points.  But from a percentage 
> basis, nothing can top the Riptorn campaign of 1998, where they 
> garnered an astonishing 95.4% of the potential points. 
>
> There have been 7 winners who finished with more than 90% of the 
> possible points:
>
> 7.     Riptorns 2002 - 90.5%
> 6.     Nukes 2004 - 91.8%
> 4.     Win-Ick Ben Ein Berliners 1992 - 92.5%
> 4.     Block's Bombers 1993 - 92.5%
> 3.     Nukes 2006 - 92.7%
> 2.     Nukes 2001 - 93%
> 1.     Riptorns 1998 - 95.4%
>
> 2.  WHAT CATEGORIES DO THE WINNERS WIN?
>
> 4.     ERA (7/19) - 37%
> 4.     Batting Average (7/19) - 37%
> 2.     Saves (9/19) - 47%
> 2.     RBI (9/19) - 47%
> 1.     Home Runs (11/19) - 58%
>
> 3.  WHAT CATEGORIES DO THE WINNERS RARELY WIN?
>
> 5.     Runs (2/6) - 33%
> 4.     Ratio (6/19) - 32%
> 3.     Strikeouts (1/6) - 17%
> 1.     Wins (3/19) - 16%
> 1.     Stolen Bases (3/19) - 16%
>     
>
> More to follow....
>
>
> Jeff Winick
>
> ________________________________
>
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail 
> <http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/index.htm?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000970> 
> !
>
> Sidley Austin LLP mail server made the following annotations on 10/08/07, 06:57:05:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you
> that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this
> communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
> used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on such 
> taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service.  In addition, if any such tax advice is used or referred
> to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or other entity,
> investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as written in connection
> with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this
> communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular
> circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20071008/e49f2292/attachment.htm