[USML Announce] Setting Lineups

Andrew R. Klein anrklein at gmail.com
Thu Apr 24 17:04:11 EDT 2008


Futile though it may be, maybe you could try to get an answer from 
support before actually pushing the button.

-Andy

Blocker, Mark B. wrote:
> League:
>  
>   I am not sure my primary concern has been fully conveyed.  If we 
> change the number of games needed to qualify from 2007, the system 
> will make the change "retroactively."  (When I started to do this, it 
> gives you a warning notifying you that this may cause prior rosters to 
> show up as illegal).  As you may recall, at the beginning of this 
> year, every time we made a retroactive change, it caused problems in 
> the entry of roster and FAAB moves, for reasons that are not at all 
> apparent.  My concern is that, if we make the retroactive change to 
> 2007 games-played requirements -- even one which logically should have 
> no impact -- it may inadvertently screw up the system in ways we do 
> not currently anticipate.  So, my question is whether it is worth 
> taking that risk to fix a single-player, single-team problem?  If the 
> league concludes that this is risk is worth taking, I will go ahead 
> and make the change (changing 20 to 18), but I want the league to do 
> so with eyes wide open in case this creates new, unanticipated problems.
>  
>   -- Mark B.
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net
>     [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] *On Behalf Of *Richard Robbins
>     *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:58 PM
>     *To:* 'USML Announcements'
>     *Subject:* RE: [USML Announce] Setting Lineups
>
>     I'm fine with what you propose, but would suggest that in order to
>     minimize inadvertent mistakes, we set the number to the highest
>     number needed to solve the problem, i.e., in this case, 18.  If we
>     need to lower it to another amount during the season to address
>     other instances discovered, then so be it.
>      
>     -- Rich
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net
>     [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] *On Behalf Of *springkerb at aol.com
>     *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:23 PM
>     *To:* announce at usml.net
>     *Subject:* Fwd: [USML Announce] Setting Lineups
>
>     Mark Blocker has asked me to raise an issue with the league.
>
>     I have discovered that the current website does not line up with
>     our league's rule on position eligibility.  For 2007, the site
>     requires the league to set a single value, so it cannot accomodate
>     the normal rule which is based on either 20 games or the position
>     at which the player appeared in the most games (if less than 20). 
>     Currently, our default is set at 20, which means that a player
>     that qualified at a position last year but did not play 20 games
>     at that position cannot be activated at that position.
>
>     I currently have this issue with Alberto Callaspo, who I'd like to
>     roster at 3B based on 2007 games played.  It seems likely to me
>     that several other players would potentially be affected as well.
>
>     As noted below, I have proposed that we fix this glitch simply be
>     resetting our default value to 1, and requiring the league's
>     owners to take responsibility for positioning players consistent
>     with our rules.  (The rule would not change, just the settings on
>     the site.)  In effect, this is what we did for years before all
>     this was automated.  Mark notes that we will essentially be on the
>     honor system, which is correct and which I don't have a problem with.
>
>     Mark's other concern is that any changes will be applied
>     retroactively and might affect standings, etc.  Logically, that
>     should not be a concern here, since it has been impossible to
>     position any player based on less than 20 games of 2007 playing
>     time.  Therefore, there should be no transactions capable of being
>     affected retroactively.  Mark agrees with this from a logical
>     perspective, but would like me to get league concurrence in case
>     something screwy happens if/when he makes the change.
>
>     Does anybody have a problem with re-setting the 2007 eligibility
>     default to 1 game and having us all take responsibility for
>     position eligibilty for our own teams?  (Winick, of course, will
>     be keeping an eye on all of us.)
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     Mark
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: springkerb at aol.com
>     To: announce at usml.net
>     Sent: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 2:04 pm
>     Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Setting Lineups
>
>     Can we just re-set the 2007 number?  We could put it at 18, which
>     would fix the situation with Callaspo, or we could put it at one
>     and handle position eligibility on an honor system.  In either
>     case, our rules say Callaspo is eligible at 3B, and that's where I
>     want him.
>
>     Mark
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Blocker, Mark B. <mblocker at Sidley.com
>     <mailto:mblocker at Sidley.com>>
>     To: USML Announcements <announce at usml.net
>     <mailto:announce at usml.net>>; MBBlocker at aol.com
>     <mailto:MBBlocker at aol.com>
>     Sent: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:10 pm
>     Subject: RE: [USML Announce] Setting Lineups
>
>     Mark:
>      
>       This cannot be fixed.  The system determines position
>     eligibility by number of games played at position in 2007 and 2008
>     (and we select what the number is).  As to 2007, the number is set
>     at 20 and for 2008 the number is 1.  There is no setting for "most
>     games played at a position."
>      
>       -- Mark B.
>      
>
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net
>         <mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net>
>         [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net
>         <mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net?>] *On Behalf Of
>         *springkerb at aol.com <mailto:springkerb at aol.com>
>         *Sent:* Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
>         *To:* announce at usml.net <mailto:announce at usml.net>;
>         MBBlocker at aol.com <mailto:MBBlocker at aol.com>
>         *Subject:* [USML Announce] Setting Lineups
>
>         I'd like to activate Alberto Callaspo at 3B (and reserve
>         Marte).  3B is Callaspo's primary position from 2007. 
>         However, our website does not recognize him as eligible at
>         3B.  Can that get fixed?
>
>         Mark
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         Get the MapQuest Toolbar
>         <http://www.mapquest.com/toolbar?NCID=mpqmap00030000000003>,
>         Maps, Traffic, Directions & More!
>
>     Sidley Austin LLP mail server made the following annotations on 04/23/08, 12:10:52:
>     -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you
>     that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this
>     communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
>     used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on such 
>     taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service.  In addition, if any such tax advice is used or referred
>     to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or other entity,
>     investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as written in connection
>     with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this
>     communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular
>     circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
>
>     ****************************************************************************************************
>     This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>     If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
>     immediately.
>
>     ****************************************************************************************************
>         
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     announce mailing list
>     announce at usml.net <mailto:announce at usml.net>
>     http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Get the MapQuest Toolbar
>     <http://www.mapquest.com/toolbar?NCID=mpqmap00030000000003>, Maps,
>     Traffic, Directions & More!
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     announce mailing list
>     announce at usml.net <mailto:announce at usml.net>
>     http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Plan your next roadtrip with MapQuest.com
>     <http://www.mapquest.com/?ncid=mpqmap00030000000004>: America's #1
>     Mapping Site.
>
> Sidley Austin LLP mail server made the following annotations on 04/24/08, 16:03:01:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you
> that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this
> communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
> used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on such 
> taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service.  In addition, if any such tax advice is used or referred
> to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or other entity,
> investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as written in connection
> with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this
> communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular
> circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20080424/77ebde78/attachment-0001.htm



More information about the Announce mailing list