[USML Announce] FORMAL RULES VOTE
Jim Barrett
chicagojab at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 23 08:24:36 EST 2008
I vote yes to trading FAAB bucks and even retroactively trading Don Money and Norm Cash.
rickgam at comcast.net wrote: Greetings;
I'll have to say NO to trading FAAB bucks. Trading Big John Buck is another story.
Rick
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: springkerb at aol.com
> I took the liberty of expanding on his behalf.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Robbins
> To: 'USML Announcements'
> Sent: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 1:35 pm
> Subject: RE: [USML Announce] FORMAL RULES VOTE
>
>
>
> That's really chatty Mark.? I thought you were going to be especially terse :-)
>
>
> From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of
> Blocker, Mark B.
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:32 PM
> To: USML Announcements
> Subject: RE: [USML Announce] FORMAL RULES VOTE
>
>
>
>
>
> voting no.
>
>
>
> From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of
> jhwinick at aol.com
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 09:38 AM
> To: announce at usml.net
> Subject: [USML Announce] FORMAL RULES VOTE
>
>
>
>
> I hereby withdraw my "super-majority" voting proposal.
>
> As co-commissioner, I?submit the only remaining rules proposal,?Mr. Robbins FAAB
> trade proposal, to a formal vote.? The language of the proposal was previously
> distributed, but the concept is that FAAB dollars would be tradeable.? Please
> cast your vote today - yes is to approve the rule change and allow FAAB dollars
> to be traded, no to stick to the status quo.
>
> Jeff Winick?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Robbins
> To: 'USML Announcements'
> Sent: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 9:06 am
> Subject: RE: [USML Announce] are votes all in?
>
>
>
> Mr. Blocker never submitted them for a formal vote.? By my count, the silly
> proposal I made won't pass and to avoid irritating debates so close to our
> draft, I'll withdraw it now.? In the same spirit, I'd ask Jeff to consider
> withdrawing his super-majority voting request.? I think that leaves my "FAAB
> trade" proposal -- which seems to have a lot of support.
>
> ?
>
> Is Blocker still participating in the league?
>
> ?
>
> Process, I crave process. . .
>
> ?
>
> -- Rich
>
>
> From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of
> Brad Jansen
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:57 AM
> To: USML Announcements
> Subject: [USML Announce] are votes all in?
>
>
>
>
> do we still need to poll superdelegates or are votes in on various proposals
> like that silly one about carrying stats from guys traded outta leahue etc....??
> Status?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail!
>
>
>
>
>
> Sidley Austin LLP mail server made the following annotations on 02/22/08,
> 13:32:15:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations,
> we inform you
> that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained
> in this
> communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used,
> and cannot be
> used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be
> imposed on such
> taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, if any such tax advice
> is used or referred
> to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or
> other entity,
> investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as
> written in connection
> with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s)
> addressed in this
> communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's
> particular
> circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
>
> ********************************************************************************
> ********************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged
> or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
> ********************************************************************************
> ********************
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> http://webmail.aol.com
From: springkerb at aol.com
To: announce at usml.net
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] FORMAL RULES VOTE
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:41:34 +0000
I took the liberty of expanding on his behalf.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Robbins <rerobbins at itinker.net>
To: 'USML Announcements' <announce at usml.net>
Sent: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 1:35 pm
Subject: RE: [USML Announce] FORMAL RULES VOTE
That's really chatty Mark. I thought you were going to be especially terse :-)
---------------------------------
From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of Blocker, Mark B.
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:32 PM
To: USML Announcements
Subject: RE: [USML Announce] FORMAL RULES VOTE
voting no.
---------------------------------
From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of jhwinick at aol.com
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 09:38 AM
To: announce at usml.net
Subject: [USML Announce] FORMAL RULES VOTE
I hereby withdraw my "super-majority" voting proposal.
As co-commissioner, I submit the only remaining rules proposal, Mr. Robbins FAAB trade proposal, to a formal vote. The language of the proposal was previously distributed, but the concept is that FAAB dollars would be tradeable. Please cast your vote today - yes is to approve the rule change and allow FAAB dollars to be traded, no to stick to the status quo.
Jeff Winick
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Robbins <rerobbins at itinker.net>
To: 'USML Announcements' <announce at usml.net>
Sent: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 9:06 am
Subject: RE: [USML Announce] are votes all in?
Mr. Blocker never submitted them for a formal vote. By my count, the silly proposal I made won't pass and to avoid irritating debates so close to our draft, I'll withdraw it now. In the same spirit, I'd ask Jeff to consider withdrawing his super-majority voting request. I think that leaves my "FAAB trade" proposal -- which seems to have a lot of support.
Is Blocker still participating in the league?
Process, I crave process. . .
-- Rich
---------------------------------
From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of Brad Jansen
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:57 AM
To: USML Announcements
Subject: [USML Announce] are votes all in?
do we still need to poll superdelegates or are votes in on various proposals like that silly one about carrying stats from guys traded outta leahue etc....? Status?
_______________________________________________ announce mailing list announce at usml.net http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
---------------------------------
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail!
Sidley Austin LLP mail server made the following annotations on 02/22/08, 13:32:15: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on such taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, if any such tax advice is used or referred to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as written in connection with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this communication and (ii) the taxpayer should
seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________ announce mailing list announce at usml.net http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20080223/b51815ad/attachment.htm
More information about the Announce
mailing list