[USML Announce] Two Rule Proposals

Brad Jansen bljansen at gmail.com
Mon Jan 21 21:44:51 EST 2008


When it comes to rule proposals I ask, "WWRD?"  Now that Rick has weighed in
I will concur with my esteemed colleague from Buffalo Grove and also vote
"No" to both proposals.

Brad Lee

P.S.  I also vote "NO" to any rule changes Prof. Klein may propose.



On Jan 21, 2008 9:28 PM, <rickgam at comcast.net> wrote:

> Greetings;
>     I hereby respectively cast my annual "no" vote for both proposals.
>   Rick
>
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: springkerb at aol.com
> > I think it would be very hard to craft a rule that would accomplish that
> purpose
> > without skewing the exiting rules.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Robbins <RERobbins at iTinker.net>
> > To: USML Announcements <announce at usml.net>
> > Sent: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 6:31 pm
> > Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Two Rule Proposals
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > That's a really interesting idea Jim.  I'm very curious about what
> people think
> > about that possibility.  I'm not sure how I feel about it.  My initial
> thought
> > is that we should not allow transferred FAAB to balance an otherwise
> imbalanced
> > trade.  I say that just to be conservative.  I offered the proposal
> merely
> > because I thought it was interesting and because it might add a fun
> element to
> > the game.  If it could be used to diminish the force of our existing
> rules re
> > imbalanced trades that might be too much.  It's an intriguing thought
> though.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Barrett <chicagojab at yahoo.com>
> >
> > Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:51:12
> > To:USML Announcements <announce at usml.net>
> > Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Two Rule Proposals
> >
> >
> > I'm in favor of the FAAB fund trading but have a question? - should/can
> FAAB
> > funds be used to help balance trades?
> > ?
> > I'm opposed to the NL stats proposal.
> >
> >
> > "Richard E. Robbins" <RERobbins at iTinker.net> wrote:
> > I've got two rule proposals.?  I'll leave it to Packer Fan Mark to call
> for a
> > vote at the appropriate time.
> > The first is that we permit FAAB funds to be traded (which I'm proposing
> on a
> > whim) and the second is to count in-season statistics of players traded
> to the
> > NL.
> > Here is the text to implement each.
> > Proposal ??" Permit Trading of FAAB Funds
> > Proposed Revised Section 12.6
> > Trades may include FAAB funds (as defined in Section 14.2).?  Trades
> involving
> > FAAB funds shall be reported and become effective in accordance with
> Section
> > 11.3.?  No trade may be made for players to be named later, Auction
> funds,
> > Rotation Draft positions or picks or future considerations of any kind.
> > Proposal ??" Count Statistics of Players Traded to the National League
> > In order to implement this proposal, we would delete Section 14.6 and
> the
> > references to Section 14.6 found in Section 15.5 and 16.5.
> > We would add the following text as a new Section or perhaps a
> stand-alone
> > Article:
> > The statistics of a player who is on the Active Roster or the Reserve
> Roster of
> > any League team and who is traded to the National League during the
> course of a
> > season will be included in calculating the cumulative statistics of the
> League
> > team that owns that player as if he remained in the American League.? The
> > player
> > can be activated, reserved, waived or traded by his League team, on the
> same
> > basis as if he remained in the American League, except that if he is
> waived he
> > may not be claimed on waivers.?  This Section shall not limit the
> application of
> > Section 17.1.
> > _______________________________________________
> > announce mailing list
> > announce at usml.net
> > http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > announce mailing list
> > announce at usml.net
> > http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > announce mailing list
> > announce at usml.net
> > http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> > http://webmail.aol.com
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: springkerb at aol.com
> To: announce at usml.net
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:26:37 +0000
> Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Two Rule Proposals
> I think it would be very hard to craft a rule that would accomplish that
> purpose without skewing the exiting rules.
> Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Robbins <RERobbins at iTinker.net>
> To: USML Announcements <announce at usml.net>
> Sent: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 6:31 pm
> Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Two Rule Proposals
>
>  That's a really interesting idea Jim.  I'm very curious about what people think
> about that possibility.  I'm not sure how I feel about it.  My initial thought
> is that we should not allow transferred FAAB to balance an otherwise imbalanced
> trade.  I say that just to be conservative.  I offered the proposal merely
> because I thought it was interesting and because it might add a fun element to
> the game.  If it could be used to diminish the force of our existing rules re
> imbalanced trades that might be too much.  It's an intriguing thought though.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Barrett <chicagojab at yahoo.com>
>
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:51:12
> To:USML Announcements <announce at usml.net>
> Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Two Rule Proposals
>
>
> I'm in favor of the FAAB fund trading but have a question - should/can FAAB
> funds be used to help balance trades?
>
> I'm opposed to the NL stats proposal.
>
>
> "Richard E. Robbins" <RERobbins at iTinker.net> wrote:
> I've got two rule proposals.  I'll leave it to Packer Fan Mark to call for a
> vote at the appropriate time.
> The first is that we permit FAAB funds to be traded (which I'm proposing on a
> whim) and the second is to count in-season statistics of players traded to the
> NL.
> Here is the text to implement each.
> Proposal ? Permit Trading of FAAB Funds
> Proposed Revised Section 12.6
> Trades may include FAAB funds (as defined in Section 14.2).  Trades involving
> FAAB funds shall be reported and become effective in accordance with Section 11.3.  No trade may be made for players to be named later, Auction funds,
> Rotation Draft positions or picks or future considerations of any kind.
> Proposal ? Count Statistics of Players Traded to the National League
> In order to implement this proposal, we would delete Section 14.6 and the
> references to Section 14.6 found in Section 15.5 and 16.5.
> We would add the following text as a new Section or perhaps a stand-alone
> Article:
> The statistics of a player who is on the Active Roster or the Reserve Roster of
> any League team and who is traded to the National League during the course of a
> season will be included in calculating the cumulative statistics of the League
> team that owns that player as if he remained in the American League.  The player
> can be activated, reserved, waived or traded by his League team, on the same
> basis as if he remained in the American League, except that if he is waived he
> may not be claimed on waivers.  This Section shall not limit the application of
> Section 17.1.
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing listannounce at usml.nethttp://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>  _______________________________________________
> announce mailing listannounce at usml.nethttp://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>  _______________________________________________
> announce mailing listannounce at usml.nethttp://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>   ------------------------------
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail<http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003>
> !
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20080121/6f475a32/attachment-0001.htm



More information about the Announce mailing list