[USML Announce] Kerbs Disses King, But Nukes Out On "Projections"

Jeff Winick jhwinick at aol.com
Mon Mar 17 07:28:41 EDT 2008


We understand all the caveats and the fact that you're not making any  
predictions. But who did your computer show as the #1 team?  We know  
it wasn't Rick. Was it you, by any chance?

The King

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 17, 2008, at 7:04 AM, springkerb at aol.com wrote:

> I haven't made any attempt at projections.  I just plugged in the  
> draft rosters.  There is, of course, a difference>
>
> Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Jansen <bljansen at gmail.com>
> To: USML Announcements <announce at usml.net>
> Sent: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 9:44 pm
> Subject: [USML Announce] Kerbs Disses King, But Nukes Out On  
> "Projections"
>
> Wha..?!  We gotta pay for a subscription to Kerbs' World  to get  
> actual predictions? Is this some teaser  or  will  you tell us  your  
> Vision  and Why  We  Must Believe  In You??
>
> Waiting for The Word,
> Brad The Truth Everett
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, <springkerb at aol.com> wrote:
> I agree that this is likely to be an interesting and competitive  
> year.   In fact, my computer projection bears little resemblance to  
> Jeff's.  I have the Daddies near the top, too, but curiously not in  
> first.  And, beyond that, my projections would appear to be looking  
> at a completely different league.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jhwinick at aol.com
> To: announce at usml.net
> Sent: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 5:14 pm
> Subject: [USML Announce] 2008 Projections - The Preliminary Version
>
> The official Shandler-Winick post draft assessment:
>
> First, an observation.  This should be the most wide open race in a  
> long while.  I don't see anyone with a overwhelming advantage and  
> noone who's out of it.
>
> Second, these are preliminary observations.  The final projections  
> will come shortly after the start of the season.
>
> 11.  GOP - Lots of speed, great average, but not nearly enough runs,  
> rbis or home runs.  Pitching is squarely in the middle of the pack,  
> but unless he gets lucky with Percival and Betancourt, he's also  
> very light on saves.  Probably doesn't have the goods to trade his  
> way out of it.
>
> 10.  Klein Nine - The problem wasn't the draft, which actually  
> wasn't half bad.  The problem was coming into the draft with almost  
> no undervalue.  The offense is not good:  a ridiculous amount of  
> power, but only a middling amount of rbi's; no speed, a  
> corresponding lack of runs and an average that is a complete  
> disaster.  Lots of wins, lots of strikeouts but at what cost?  Lousy  
> ERA, Lousy Ratio and only one closer means middle of the pack, at  
> best, in saves.  Not enough in the bank to turn this around this  
> year, but plenty of tools to come back strong in 2009.
>
> 9.  Lake Michigan Calamari - Other than an absence of speed and lots  
> of saves, middle of the pack in nearly every category.   If  
> Bonderman and Escobar stay healthy, the pitching might be fairly  
> good, but with only 5 drafted starters, they had better be healthy.   
> Might catch a break with Adenhart, who stands a shot at filling in  
> for Lackey.  The offense is O L D.  9 players older than 30, so the  
> future is now.
>
> 8.  Nukes - Light on power, lousy average, but middle of the pack or  
> better everywhere else.  The season probably turns on where Roberts  
> lands.  If he stays in the AL, this is a team that could challenge.   
> If not, this team is going to be one to watch over the next few years.
>
> 7.  Block's Bombers -  The problem is the pitching.  Its Bedard and  
> then hold your breath.  Even after plugging in Joba, there are alot  
> of holes.  Hoey, Niemann, Morrow and Perkins are all just as likely  
> to be relievers as starters.  That leaves the Bombers starved for  
> wins.  Surprisingly, despite the heavy balance of relievers, the  
> Bombers also have lousy ERA and Ratio.   That's what Todd Jones, Joe  
> Borowski and a bunch of rookies will do.  Other than being light on  
> speed, the offense looks good.  A nice core of prospects and keepers  
> means this team can contend.
>
> 6.  Brats - No wins and no runs.  But lots of everything else.  The  
> team is fairly young with lots of upside.  Thames and Shannon  
> Stewart at two of the outfield slots is a bit disconcerting, but  
> there's a lot to like here.  Not sure there's enough to win, but  
> with a little bit of luck, this team could contend.
>
> 5.  Angry Young Men - The first of the teams that should be serious  
> contenders for the title.  The AYM had the best retention roster  
> until they spent $35 on extended salaries.  That should mean this  
> team contends for the next few years, but it does push it back in  
> the pack as far as contending this year.  The offense is excellent,  
> but the pitching is a bit scary.  Verlander and Halliday is a great  
> start, but it then gets scary.  Colon, Mussina, Floyd and Silva  
> means that there are going to be some frightening boxscores for this  
> team.  And it shows in the projections.  The best projected offense  
> and the worst projected pitching.  The pieces are here to win, but  
> it will take a willingness to sacrifice the future a bit.
>
> 4.  Berliners - Its hard to overcome an $18 handicap, so sacrifices  
> were necessary.  Drafted lots of players with potential, but not  
> much in the way of solid track records.  It will take lots of good  
> fortune to turn that potential into performance.  It starts with the  
> pitching, for sure.  Lackey's recovery is a must.  If he doesn't get  
> healthy quickly, this team will be looking at 2009 quickly.  But  
> there are lots of young pitchers with a shot to put up decent  
> seasons.  The offense is also young with the potential to surprise.   
> No speed, but otherwise a well balanced team.  Best guess is that  
> this team shoots for 2009, but it has a shot to make things  
> interesting this year.
>
> 3.  Riptorns -Came into the draft as the team to beat, but didn't  
> get enough offense at the draft.  Great pitching.  Okay, really,  
> really great pitching.  This team ought to run away with wins, K's,  
> ERA and ratio.  No saves, but my guess is that Brad Lee will find a  
> way to trade out of that problem.  Too many holes in the offense  
> means he'll have to trade out of that as well.  More than enough  
> pieces to make that happen and heaven knows Brad Lee will give it  
> the old college try.
>
> 2.  Red Hots - Top notch offense and decent pitching.   Consider  
> this:  Hinske, German and Murphy occupy three of the offensive slots  
> and this is still one of the best two offenses in the league.   King  
> Felix heads a potentially strong staff, but there are as many  
> questions as answers.  Is Lester healthy again and will he find the  
> plate often enough?  Is Garza for real or did Minnesota let him go  
> for good reason?  Is Paul Byrd still using the PED's and, if not,  
> will his numbers suffer?  Is Fernando Rodney's health going to be a  
> problem?  Well....you see what I mean.  The pitching will be the  
> challenge here.  Plenty of top prospects and keepers to use as bait  
> to fill any holes.  The question, as always, is whether Rich can  
> part with any of his prized players to make a run for the roses.   
> History suggests he can't and he won't.  If Rich bucks his  
> instincts, this team can, and maybe, should win.
>
> 1.  Hoosier Daddies - Maybe, just maybe, Rick gets the last  
> "laffey".  The eptiome of a well balanced team.  Rick came to the  
> table with a nice keeper list and then did exactly what he needed to  
> do to fill in the gaps.  A quietly terrific draft, Rick looks strong  
> everywhere except power and strikeouts. Rick projects to the third  
> best offense and the second best pitching.  Its hard to take issue  
> with this team, the frontrunner for the 2009 Damon.  More than  
> enough beans to fill in the gaps and deal with unexpected trouble.
>
> Let the games begin!!!!
>
> The King
>
>
>
> Supercharge your AIM. Get the AIM toolbar for your browser.
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
> Supercharge your AIM. Get the AIM toolbar for your browser.
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
> Supercharge your AIM. Get the AIM toolbar for your browser.
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20080317/85c657a9/attachment-0001.htm



More information about the Announce mailing list