[USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification

jhwinick at aol.com jhwinick at aol.com
Sun Mar 21 14:43:30 EDT 2010


Since Jim faced this situation before and we waived the player and made him wait until the first FAAB, I think we should consider this discussion closed.  There's absolutely no reason to deviate from past practice.  I took Mark B's proposal as a request to codify the league's prior practice.

Jeff









-----Original Message-----
From: Richard E. Robbins <RERobbins at iTinker.net>
To: 'USML Announcements' <announce at usml.net>
Sent: Sun, Mar 21, 2010 2:39 pm
Subject: RE: [USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification


Can we deal with the current issue on an ad hoc basis right now and then deal with rules proposals and text amendment during the deep off season?
 
Right now people may vote one way based on how it impacts their current situation and another if dealing with the issue in the abstract.
 
I don't have strong feelings either way about the substance of this one -- but I really do prefer to keep in line with our well established framework for amending our now, pretty stable rules.
 
Would we need a substantial super majority or will a simple majority carry the day?
 
Over and out.
 
-- Rich
 
From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of jhwinick at aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 2:30 PM
To: announce at usml.net
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification




Mark,
 
I like the rules proposal and vote yes.
 
As for my roster:
 
1.  You have the correct Josh Fields
2.  You're missing Ramon Castro at $2
 
Thanks.
 
Jeff






-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Blocker <mbblocker at aol.com>
To: 'USML Announcements' <announce at usml.net>
Sent: Sun, Mar 21, 2010 1:59 pm
Subject: [USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification



Since the problem of teams acquiring players from the NL has occurred in the past, and will likely occur in the future, I propose we codify our proposed solution in the rules for future reference.  Here is a proposed rule, to be inserted as section 5.6 of our rules:
 
5.6  If a team acquires a player in the Rotation Draft that does not meet the criteria set forth in Section 5.2, the player will, upon discovery, be deemed waived effective as of the conclusion of the Rotation Draft.  Such team shall have no right to select a replacement player, but instead may acquire a player for that slot in accordance with Article XIV.
 


_______________________________________________
nnounce mailing list
nnounce at usml.net
ttp://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce



_______________________________________________
nnounce mailing list
nnounce at usml.net
ttp://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20100321/cbe29145/attachment.htm



More information about the Announce mailing list