[USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification

[Jim Barrett]

I agree as well.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:46 PM, "Mark Blocker" <mbblocker at aol.com> wrote:

> I agree with Jeff on the rule change.  We forget about all these  
> issues in the off-season.  When someone starts off their e-mail with 
>  ?does anyone remember how we handled X? last time it occurred, I  
> think that?s a sign that we should simply codify our resolution.  I  
> am not talking about massive re-writes of the rules.  I just want to 
>  tweak the small things that occur occasionally.  As for rules that  
> affect the draft, the perfect time to tweak them is right after the  
> draft.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net]  
> On Behalf Of jhwinick at aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 2:43 PM
> To: announce at usml.net
> Subject: Re: [USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification
>
>
>
> Since Jim faced this situation before and we waived the player and  
> made him wait until the first FAAB, I think we should consider this  
> discussion closed.  There's absolutely no reason to deviate from  
> past practice.  I took Mark B's proposal as a request to codify the  
> league's prior practice.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard E. Robbins <RERobbins at iTinker.net>
> To: 'USML Announcements' <announce at usml.net>
> Sent: Sun, Mar 21, 2010 2:39 pm
> Subject: RE: [USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification
>
> Can we deal with the current issue on an ad hoc basis right now and  
> then deal with rules proposals and text amendment during the deep  
> off season?
>
>
>
> Right now people may vote one way based on how it impacts their  
> current situation and another if dealing with the issue in the  
> abstract.
>
>
>
> I don't have strong feelings either way about the substance of this  
> one -- but I really do prefer to keep in line with our well  
> established framework for amending our now, pretty stable rules.
>
>
>
> Would we need a substantial super majority or will a simple majority  
> carry the day?
>
>
>
> Over and out.
>
>
>
> -- Rich
>
>
>
> From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net]  
> On Behalf Of jhwinick at aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 2:30 PM
> To: announce at usml.net
> Subject: Re: [USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification
>
> Mark,
>
>
>
> I like the rules proposal and vote yes.
>
>
>
> As for my roster:
>
>
>
> 1.  You have the correct Josh Fields
>
> 2.  You're missing Ramon Castro at $2
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Blocker <mbblocker at aol.com>
> To: 'USML Announcements' <announce at usml.net>
> Sent: Sun, Mar 21, 2010 1:59 pm
> Subject: [USML Announce] USML - Proposed rule codification
>
> Since the problem of teams acquiring players from the NL has  
> occurred in the past, and will likely occur in the future, I propose  
> we codify our proposed solution in the rules for future reference.   
> Here is a proposed rule, to be inserted as section 5.6 of our rules:
>
>
>
> 5.6  If a team acquires a player in the Rotation Draft that does not  
> meet the criteria set forth in Section 5.2, the player will, upon  
> discovery, be deemed waived effective as of the conclusion of the  
> Rotation Draft.  Such team shall have no right to select a  
> replacement player, but instead may acquire a player for that slot  
> in accordance with Article XIV.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20100321/d6b23e4d/attachment.htm