[USML Announce] USML Rules Voting

[Jim Barrett]

Question regarding our options for 3: What if a majority of owners are in favor of doing something about the "creation fix" problem but a majority doesn't support any one of the three alternatives?  Will there be a run-off of the plurality selection (a,b, or c) against the option of doing nothing? 

MBBlocker at aol.com wrote:Gang --
 
  There are by my count a total of five rule proposals.  Three of the rules proposals suggest a fix for the same problem (the "creation" of asterisk players) and the other two proposals are free-standing.  In order to permit meaningful voting, I believe you should vote for only ONE of the three "creation" fix proposals, and then yes or no on the remainder.  In short form, the rules proposals are as follows:
 
1.  Permit trading of FAAB Dollars
 
2.  Count statistics of players traded to the NL
 
3.  Creation fix proposals
 
   a.  E-bay bidding proposal
 
   b.  Skinny FAAB proposal (reduction of FAAB budgets to $20)
 
   c.  Players acquired throug FAAB cannot be asterisk players
 
  Please submit vote by February 10; feel free to make comments on the proposals either in your vote or separately, but make sure your vote is clear.
 
  Thanks.
 
  -- Mark B.
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rochester.hostforweb.net/pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20040207/40efca11/attachment.htm