[USML Announce] Non Roster Invitees

[Andrew R. Klein]

Because there's no certainty with Blanton, Reed, Craine, etc.  It's sort of like assuming Delgado will play catcher ... 

Anyway, I'm OK with Maurer.  Why not go with your earlier suggestion, including anyone currently listed as "first string" on mlb.com's depth charts?  

-Andy
----------------------------------------------------------
Andrew R. Klein
Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis
(317) 274-2099
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: JHWinick at aol.com 
  To: announce at usml.net 
  Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:53 PM
  Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Non Roster Invitees


  In a message dated 3/8/2004 12:49:24 PM Central Standard Time, anrklein at yahoo.com writes:
    First, people compete to be at the top of the reserve draft -- it *should* be an advantage in picking prospects, if that's what owner wants to do. 
  No argument - it should be an advantage in picking prospects.  But it shouldn't be an advantage in picking major league players.  The NRI list is chock full of players that may have major league value this year - not mere prospects.  Give me one good reason to exclude them other than a desire for simplicity.

  Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rochester.hostforweb.net/pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20040308/2e0a65d4/attachment.htm