I third the vote.....(I'm pretty sure I voted this way before, but who the
hell knows?)
"Andy Klein"
<anrklein at yahoo.c To: "USML Announcements" <announce at usml.net>
om> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [USML Announce] New vote
announce-bounces@
usml.net
03/09/2004 11:28
AM
Please respond to
"USML
Announcements"
I vote the same as Kerber.
-Andy
--- SpringKerb at aol.com wrote:
> 40s--Yes.
> NRIs who are non-rookies--Yes.
> Joe Mauer--Yes.
> Non-Mauer rookies on the NRI--No.
>
> All NRIs to be limited to those specifically
> identified to date. In other words, here's the
> equation: Pool = 40 Man Rosters + Mauer +
> non-rookies (only) on Winick's list.
>
> There were two ideas that everyone already agreed
> to: (1) rookies in general would not be draft
> eligible, with the notable exception of Mauer, and
> (2)non-rookies NRIs would be specifically
> identified. Since we all agreed to those ideas,
> let's try to stick close to them.
>
> Mark
>
=====
Andrew R. Klein
anrklein at yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com