[USML Announce] Serious Rule Change Proposal

[springkerb at aol.com]

I've lost track of what the actual proposal is.  Was it Andy's original one or the June 1 modification?  If Andy's original proposal is still on the table, I vote no.
 
Mark 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: bljansen at gmail.com
To: announce at usml.net
Sent: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Serious Rule Change Proposal


I agree with RER (even though he certainly traded me Fernando Cabrera early enough last season...) and support the Grin and Barrett Rule.  Andy, if you were here I'd say, "Come here and give me a hug, will ya, but just don't touch my Wood or Jeffrey's Putz."  Now, let's get ready for '08...I mean '07!!! 
 
BLJ

 
On 3/28/07, Richard E. Robbins <RERobbins at itinker.net> wrote: 
People can say what they want about last year, but I thought it was a great one.  Great draft day risk taking by some coupled with a series of brilliant trades by several team owners.  The trades included both the now for the future variety as well as the current year category swaps.  Lots of teams were involved in trades (sadly, the Red-Hots not often enough).  Our anti-dumping rules limited the ability of a single pair of trading partners to engage in one or more outcome determinative moves.  The talent (both current and future) was dispersed fairly widely around the league.  Too make it sound like the fun has been sapped from the league doesn't ring true to me.
 
I disagree with Mark Blocker's observation that limiting rules changes to the deep off-season is a recipe for never making any changes.  We have a rich history of making rule changes that proves otherwise.  Think about what it took to get the current anti-dumping rules in place.  That involved lots of debate and careful drafting done in the off-season. 
 
What Jeff suggests seems straight-forward enough and from my perspective, appears unlikely to have significant unintended effects.
 
I can support this alternative.
 
Can we please not engage in a current rules debate about a controversial issue.  All we'll achieve is ill-will and poorly drafted rules.  If people care about this topic enough then they should be able to remember to raise it at an appropriate time.  Now is not that time. 
 
-- Rich 
 



From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of JHWinick at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:37 PM
To: announce at usml.net 
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Serious Rule Change Proposal

 
In a message dated 3/28/2007 2:23:07 P.M. Central Daylight Time, RERobbins at iTinker.net writes:
Let me try to rephrase what I think you are suggesting Jeff.
 
The rule would prohibit the trade of a player prior to June 1 if that player's USML contract is not yet running.
 
Is that the proposal?
 
-- Rich


I think that's it.


See what's free at AOL.com. 

_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce




_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20070328/d035a398/attachment.htm