[USML Announce] Roster Question

[Jeff Winick]

Mark,

I thought you were going in a different direction after you said it won't matter. 

It won't matter because he sucks. 

Jeff

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 12, 2012, at 5:29 PM, "Blocker, Mark B." <mblocker at Sidley.com> wrote:

> Dennis:  I will correct both of those for you.  On Carter, I am not sure  it matters much, because if he loses rookie status this year, he will be a Y1, which is how he is listed now.
>  
> From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf Of Dennis Adams
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:49 PM
> To: USML Announcements
> Subject: [USML Announce] Roster Question
>  
> Quick question for the Master & Commander (whomever that may be)......  I have 2 players on my reserve roster whose contracts are currently running (according to the league site) but should not be.
>  
> 1) Chris Carter -  Only has 114 career at bats, and roughly 20-something days of MLB service during a 25-man roster period. 
>  
> 2) Danny Hultzen -  Has yet to play in the majors.
>  
> Since both of these players were rotation draft guys, and I have never activated either of them, shouldnt they both still be Y0 players?
>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dennis F. Adams III
> Candidate, Juris Doctor 2013
> Northwestern University School of Law
>  
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you
> that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this
> communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
> used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on such 
> taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service.  In addition, if any such tax advice is used or referred
> to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or other entity,
> investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as written in connection
> with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this
> communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular
> circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
> immediately.
> 
> ****************************************************************************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://usml.net/pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20120412/191fd3a7/attachment-0001.html>