[USML Announce] Roster Question

[Dennis Adams]

I agree with both of those and will add a third reason:  i will not be
keeping him anyway.  But yeah, i was mostly concerned with Hultzen.
On Apr 12, 2012 5:36 PM, "Jeff Winick" <jhwinick at aol.com> wrote:

> Mark,
>
> I thought you were going in a different direction after you said it won't
> matter.
>
> It won't matter because he sucks.
>
> Jeff
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 5:29 PM, "Blocker, Mark B." <mblocker at Sidley.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dennis:  I will correct both of those for you.  On Carter, I am not sure
> it matters much, because if he loses rookie status this year, he will be a
> Y1, which is how he is listed now.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Dennis Adams
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:49 PM
> *To:* USML Announcements
> *Subject:* [USML Announce] Roster Question****
>
> ** **
>
> Quick question for the Master & Commander (whomever that may be)......  I
> have 2 players on my reserve roster whose contracts are currently running
> (according to the league site) but should not be.****
>
>  ****
>
> 1) Chris Carter -  Only has 114 career at bats, and roughly 20-something
> days of MLB service during a 25-man roster period.  ****
>
>  ****
>
> 2) Danny Hultzen -  Has yet to play in the majors.****
>
>  ****
>
> Since both of these players were rotation draft guys, and I have never
> activated either of them, shouldnt they both still be Y0 players?****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> --
> Dennis F. Adams III
> Candidate, Juris Doctor 2013
> Northwestern University School of Law****
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury
> regulations, we inform you
> that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice
> contained in this
> communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be
> used, and cannot be
> used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may
> be imposed on such
> taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service.  In addition, if any such tax
> advice is used or referred
> to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any
> partnership or other entity,
> investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as
> written in connection
> with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or
> matter(s) addressed in this
> communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the
> taxpayer's particular
> circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://usml.net/pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20120412/fde85118/attachment-0001.html>