[USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

Sat Mar 16 13:12:54 EDT 2013

Lovin the pre-draft chatter!  While I should be spending these precious
final hours doing last minute prep, I am off to go check out this
radioactive river and imbibe in the nectar of the Irish.  Which reminds me,
is it a requirement to wear green to the draft tomorrow?

Happy draft eve!

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jeffrey Winick
<jwinick at harriswinick.com>wrote:

>
>
> As I said before.  So many questions.  So few answers.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Richard Robbins
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:08 PM
>
> *To:* USML Announcements
> *Subject:* Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> But he's a Winick pan dammit!****
>
> ** **
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jeffrey Winick <jwinick at harriswinick.com>
> wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
> But that’s what makes this interesting, isn’t it?  Is this what you should
> know or what I want you to think you should know?****
>
>  ****
>
> And Shandler says Norris is a mortal lock to put up at least $11 worth of
> value.  He loves this kid so much, if Bud were a few years younger, Ron
> would be trying to adopt him.  I think if you start the bidding at $13, you
> might be able to scare the rest of us away.  Go for it.****
>
>  ****
>
> Jeff****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Richard Robbins
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:01 PM
> *To:* USML Announcements
> *Subject:* Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> Who says you aren't telling me anything I don't already know?****
>
>  ****
>
> By the way, how confident is Shandler in his valuation of stud fireballer
> Bud Norris?****
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Jeffrey Winick <jwinick at harriswinick.com>
> wrote:****
>
>  ****
>
> Yep – I was right.  But you didn’t listen then and you won’t listen now.
> But this time, don’t look for me to dump to you.****
>
>  ****
>
> Jeff****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Richard Robbins
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:59 AM
> *To:* USML Announcements
> *Subject:* Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> Is this like two years ago when you told me pre-draft that I needed to get
> Verlander or Lester or both in order to win?****
>
>  ****
>
> We all remember how that turned out.****
>
>  ****
>
> :-)****
>
>  ****
>
> -- Rich****
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jeffrey Winick <jwinick at harriswinick.com>
> wrote:****
>
>  ****
>
> Skippy,****
>
>  ****
>
> Now that you’ve completed your exhaustive analysis you must also see that
> the only way Rich doesn’t win is if he fails to purchase 1 or 2 of the big
> dogs at Corner/Middle, right?****
>
>  ****
>
> Jeff****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Blocker, Mark B.
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:37 AM
> *To:* USML Announcements****
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> I prefer “inexpensive,” and I pass no judgments on who should buy what
> players.  I leave that to greater minds than mine (i.e., everyone else in
> the league).****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Jeffrey Winick
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:36 AM
> *To:* announce at usml.net
> *Subject:* Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy****
>
>  ****
>
> But even your cheap software leads one to the inescapable conclusion that
> Rich needs to buy one or more of the top guys at corner and middle, right?
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> Jeff****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blocker, Mark B. <mblocker at Sidley.com>
> To: USML Announcements <announce at usml.net>
> Sent: Sat, Mar 16, 2013 11:23 am
> Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy****
>
> Fascinating.  I assumed my inferior, $19 software would produce values
> that were only useful in a relative sense, but it has nearly the same
> inflated values for all of the players listed below.  Thanks for the
> update, Jeff.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net<announce-bounces at usml.net?>]
> *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey Winick
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:15 AM
> *To:* announce at usml.net
> *Subject:* [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy****
>
>  ****
>
> Seeing that most of us at the draft table will be utilizing Rotolab, I
> have a few questions: ****
>
>  ****
>
> 1.  Miguel Cabrera is listed as being worth $36, with an inflated value of
> $42.  If John is going to start the bidding at $45, you've really got to
> let him have him at that price, right?****
>
> 2.  Felix Hernandez is listed as being worth $22 with an inflated value of
> $28.  My instincts tell me that he's worth far more than that and I know
> that Skippy really wants him.  How much is too much?****
>
> 3.  MOT Ian Kinsler is listed as being worth only $21 with an inflated
> value of $25.  How much higher than $25 is it worth going to outbid Skippy
> and his attempts to price enforce?****
>
> 4.  Rotolab says Trevor Bauer isn't worth even a $1.  We all know that's
> horribly wrong.  But how high do I bid up John before it starts to get
> crazy?****
>
> 5.  Shane Victorino is listed as the most valuable outfielder even though
> he had a poor season last year and isn't getting any younger at 32 years
> old?  Did Shandler make a mistake?****
>
> 6.  It's crystal clear that anyone in Rich's shoes would know that he had
> to buy one or more of the top guys at corner and middle.  Rotolab says that
> the best players are Cabrera ($42), Pujols ($36), Reyes ($36), Beltre ($29)
> and Longoria ($27).  Since Rich is almost certainly going to win anyway, do
> I: (i) let him have these guys at these prices, (ii) bid him up until I run
> out of money or (iii) count on Kerber to take care of the dirty work?****
>
>  ****
>
> So many questions.  So few answers.  I'm still trying to figure this out,
> so I'll probably have more questions later today.  TIA****
>
>  ****
>
> Jeff****
>
>  ****
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury
> regulations, we inform you
> that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice
> contained in this
> communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be
> used, and cannot be
> used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may
> be imposed on such
> taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service.  In addition, if any such tax
> advice is used or referred
> to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any
> partnership or other entity,
> investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as
> written in connection
> with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or
> matter(s) addressed in this
> communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the
> taxpayer's particular
> circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> ****
>
> _______________________________________________****
>
> announce mailing list****
>
> announce at usml.net****
>
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce****
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ***
> *
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ***
> *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ***
> *
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ***
> *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ***
> *
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ***
> *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ***
> *
>
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>

-- 
Dennis F. Adams III
Candidate, Juris Doctor 2013
Northwestern University School of Law
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://usml.net/pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20130316/6c55a257/attachment-0001.html>