[USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

Blocker, Mark B. mblocker at Sidley.com
Sat Mar 16 13:13:58 EDT 2013


Yes.  My understanding is that knowledgeable owners will be wearing
Green and Gold.

 

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf Of Dennis Adams
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:13 PM
To: USML Announcements
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

 

Lovin the pre-draft chatter!  While I should be spending these precious
final hours doing last minute prep, I am off to go check out this
radioactive river and imbibe in the nectar of the Irish.  Which reminds
me, is it a requirement to wear green to the draft tomorrow?

 

Happy draft eve!

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jeffrey Winick
<jwinick at harriswinick.com> wrote:

 

As I said before.  So many questions.  So few answers.

 

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf Of Richard Robbins
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:08 PM


To: USML Announcements
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

 



But he's a Winick pan dammit!

 

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jeffrey Winick
<jwinick at harriswinick.com> wrote:

 

But that's what makes this interesting, isn't it?  Is this what you
should know or what I want you to think you should know?

 

And Shandler says Norris is a mortal lock to put up at least $11 worth
of value.  He loves this kid so much, if Bud were a few years younger,
Ron would be trying to adopt him.  I think if you start the bidding at
$13, you might be able to scare the rest of us away.  Go for it.

 

Jeff

 

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf Of Richard Robbins
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:01 PM
To: USML Announcements
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

 



Who says you aren't telling me anything I don't already know?

 

By the way, how confident is Shandler in his valuation of stud
fireballer Bud Norris?

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Jeffrey Winick
<jwinick at harriswinick.com> wrote:

 

Yep - I was right.  But you didn't listen then and you won't listen now.
But this time, don't look for me to dump to you.

 

Jeff

 

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf Of Richard Robbins
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:59 AM
To: USML Announcements
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

 



Is this like two years ago when you told me pre-draft that I needed to
get Verlander or Lester or both in order to win?

 

We all remember how that turned out.

 

:-)

 

-- Rich

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jeffrey Winick
<jwinick at harriswinick.com> wrote:

 

Skippy,

 

Now that you've completed your exhaustive analysis you must also see
that the only way Rich doesn't win is if he fails to purchase 1 or 2 of
the big dogs at Corner/Middle, right?

 

Jeff

 

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf Of Blocker, Mark B.
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:37 AM
To: USML Announcements


Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

 

 

I prefer "inexpensive," and I pass no judgments on who should buy what
players.  I leave that to greater minds than mine (i.e., everyone else
in the league).

 

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Winick
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:36 AM
To: announce at usml.net
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

 

But even your cheap software leads one to the inescapable conclusion
that Rich needs to buy one or more of the top guys at corner and middle,
right? 

 

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Blocker, Mark B. <mblocker at Sidley.com>
To: USML Announcements <announce at usml.net>
Sent: Sat, Mar 16, 2013 11:23 am
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

Fascinating.  I assumed my inferior, $19 software would produce values
that were only useful in a relative sense, but it has nearly the same
inflated values for all of the players listed below.  Thanks for the
update, Jeff.

 

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net
<mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net?> ] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Winick
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:15 AM
To: announce at usml.net
Subject: [USML Announce] Rotolab Strategy

 

Seeing that most of us at the draft table will be utilizing Rotolab, I
have a few questions: 

 

1.  Miguel Cabrera is listed as being worth $36, with an inflated value
of $42.  If John is going to start the bidding at $45, you've really got
to let him have him at that price, right?

2.  Felix Hernandez is listed as being worth $22 with an inflated value
of $28.  My instincts tell me that he's worth far more than that and I
know that Skippy really wants him.  How much is too much?

3.  MOT Ian Kinsler is listed as being worth only $21 with an inflated
value of $25.  How much higher than $25 is it worth going to outbid
Skippy and his attempts to price enforce?

4.  Rotolab says Trevor Bauer isn't worth even a $1.  We all know that's
horribly wrong.  But how high do I bid up John before it starts to get
crazy?

5.  Shane Victorino is listed as the most valuable outfielder even
though he had a poor season last year and isn't getting any younger at
32 years old?  Did Shandler make a mistake?

6.  It's crystal clear that anyone in Rich's shoes would know that he
had to buy one or more of the top guys at corner and middle.  Rotolab
says that the best players are Cabrera ($42), Pujols ($36), Reyes ($36),
Beltre ($29) and Longoria ($27).  Since Rich is almost certainly going
to win anyway, do I: (i) let him have these guys at these prices, (ii)
bid him up until I run out of money or (iii) count on Kerber to take
care of the dirty work?

 

So many questions.  So few answers.  I'm still trying to figure this
out, so I'll probably have more questions later today.  TIA

 

Jeff

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury
regulations, we inform you
that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this
communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be
used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may
be imposed on such 
taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service.  In addition, if any such tax
advice is used or referred
to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any
partnership or other entity,
investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed
as written in connection
with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or
matter(s) addressed in this
communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the
taxpayer's particular
circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
************************************************************************
****************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
attachments and notify us
immediately.

************************************************************************
****************************

_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com 



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com 


_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce

 



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com 



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com 


_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce

 



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com 



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com 


_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce

 



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com 



This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com 


_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce





 

-- 
Dennis F. Adams III
Candidate, Juris Doctor 2013
Northwestern University School of Law 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://usml.net/pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20130316/0cb3220d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Announce mailing list