[USML Announce] Serious Rule Change Proposal

[Andrew R. Klein]

My Dear Bradley:

You are wrong.  My two statements are consistent.  The trade made sense 
under our rules.  But putting it together was not a challenging 
exercise, nor did it require any level of "strategy", as one of your 
earlier messages suggested.

Your Friend,

Andy

Brad Jansen wrote:
> Andy!
>   Not casting aspersions? Wha?!  Read what you wrote:
>   
> I suppose one could look at the way the league handles minor leaguers as
> a strategic element of the game.  But, to me, trading a 19-year old
> prospect for a $40 player in April doesn't strike me as particularly
> strategic or challenging.
>  
>  
> If that ain't casting aspersions, then I'm no League Ass Wipe, my 
> friend.  Don't make me stick up for Jeffrey, please, but that 
> statement sure doesn't "suggest" the deal "made perfect sense under 
> our current rules...."   You've been interpreting too many 
> constitutions, I guess....and, really, it certainly is OK, if not 
> appropriate, to cast aspersions on Jeffrey.
>  
> Regards and regardless,
> BLJ
>  
>
>  
> On 3/28/07, *Andrew R. Klein* <anrklein at yahoo.com 
> <mailto:anrklein at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>     Jeff-
>
>     I'm not casting aspersions on A-Rod for Wood.  To the contrary, I
>     suggested that it made perfect sense under our current rules. 
>     That's why I'm proposing a change.
>
>     I am happy to consider alternatives along the lines of the Barrett
>     Rule.
>
>     -Andy
>
>      
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20070328/a894d1fa/attachment.htm