[USML Announce] RULE CHANGE

[Richard E. Robbins]

Aah -- my favorite rule proposal.
 
Buddha, I've championed that one numerous times and have never prevailed.
I've been close. . .
 
I must have missed your email message in December -- I'd have jumped at the
chance to raise it again.
 
I'll let others decide how we are to proceed since it appears that it may be
open season on the rules.
 
Consistent with my prior messages today, I think that this is a bad time to
make rule changes.  But, if we're going to do so I'm not sure why we'd draw
the line at Andy and Jim's proposals.
 
I'm sure I can dig through the archives to find text to implement what you
suggest.
 
If we're going to vote on this one you have my support -- even though I
don't think we should be changing rules now.
 
I'm not going to spend much time debating this stuff futher.  I've got to
prepare for the draft.  Let me know how these things come out boys.
 
I'll update the text of the Constitution when you tell me how it needs to
read.
 
Over and out.
 
-- Rich

  _____  

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf
Of Bbuddhas at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:58 PM
To: announce at usml.net
Subject: [USML Announce] RULE CHANGE


I'd support Andy's proposed rule change and if that doesn't fly I'll live
with the Calamari change.
 
I proposed a rule change in December that I never saw a vote on:
 
I think if a guy gets dealt to the NL you should keep accruing his stats.
You can't retain a player for the following year if he's  on an NL roster
but to lose a guy because he is dealt seems insane and always has seemed
that way to me.



  _____  

See what's free at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503> . 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lyra.siteprotect.com/pipermail/announce/attachments/20070328/1e3169f9/attachment.htm